When appearing to be a victim, what dual strategic outcomes are achieved simultaneously?

When appearing to be a victim, two distinct strategic outcomes are achieved simultaneously. The first outcome is the acquisition of support and a reduction in personal accountability for oneself. By presenting oneself as harmed or disadvantaged, one elicits empathy and sympathy from others, which can translate into receiving practical aid, emotional backing, or a more lenient judgment of one's own actions. This strategic positioning reduces personal responsibility or blame for any associated negative circumstances, as others are inclined to offer solace and assistance rather than criticism. For instance, an individual portraying themselves as a victim of economic hardship may gain public sympathy and receive financial assistance. The second outcome is the discrediting or weakening of a perceived aggressor or opposing entity. This involves subtly or explicitly directing negative attention, blame, or moral condemnation towards another individual, group, or circumstance as the source of the perceived victimhood. By occupying the moral high ground associated with being a victim, one can strategically undermine the credibility, legitimacy, or public standing of an opponent, thereby shifting adverse consequences or scrutiny away from oneself and onto the designated antagonist. For example, a political candidate claiming to be the target of unfair media attacks simultaneously garners support for themselves and casts their critics as biased or unjust.