What are the implications of using the jussive mood (المجزوم) in the apodosis (جواب الشرط) of a conditional sentence?

In Arabic conditional sentences (الجمل الشرطية), the apodosis (جواب الشرط), or the result clause, specifies the outcome if the condition stated in the protasis (فعل الشرط), or the conditional clause, is met. The mood of the verb in the apodosis is crucial for determining the sentence's meaning and structure. The jussive mood (المجزوم) in the apodosis has specific implications, primarily when the conditional particle (أداة الشرط) used is one that necessitates the jussive mood in both the protasis and the apodosis. These particles include 'إنْ' (in - if), 'مَنْ' (man - whoever), 'مَا' (mā - whatever), 'مَهْمَا' (mahmā - whatever), 'مَتَى' (matā - whenever), 'أَيْنَ' (ayna - wherever), 'أَيَّانَ' (ayyāna - when), 'أَنَّى' (annā - however), 'حَيْثُمَا' (ḥaythumā - wherever), 'كَيْفَمَا' (kayfamā - however), and 'إِذْمَا' (idhmā - if). When one of these particles introduces a conditional sentence, *both the protasis and the apodosismust be in the jussive mood. The jussive mood indicates a potential or hypothetical action, and in the apodosis, it shows that the result is directly dependent on the fulfillment of the condition. For example, 'إن تدرسْ تنجحْ' (in tadrus tanjaḥ) means 'If you study, you will succeed.' Here, 'تدرسْ' (tadrus - you study) is in the jussive mood because of 'إنْ' (in), and 'تنجحْ' (tanjaḥ - you will succeed) is also in the jussive mood, indicating that success is contingent upon studying. The use of the jussive in the apodosis signals a *direct and necessary consequenceof the condition being met. If a different structure is used, such as employing 'fa' (ف), then a different mood might be used, but the presence of 'fa' usually marks a shift in sentence structure necessitated by conditions like the apodosis being a nominal sentence, or beginning with certain particles or verbs that cannot be directly jussive.