What is the central aim of limiting or banning particular types of weapon in arms control treaties?

The central aim of limiting or banning particular types of weapon in arms control treaties is to enhance international security by reducing the risk of war, minimizing the damage if war occurs, and saving resources that would otherwise be spent on developing, producing, and deploying those weapons. By placing constraints on specific types of weapons, treaties aim to prevent their use in ways that could escalate conflicts, cause excessive harm to civilians, or undermine strategic stability. For instance, the ban on chemical weapons in the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) aims to prevent the use of these inhumane weapons, which cause indiscriminate suffering. Similarly, limiting the deployment of anti-ballistic missile (ABM) systems, as was the goal of the ABM Treaty, sought to preserve strategic stability by preventing either side from gaining a decisive advantage in a nuclear exchange. The underlying objective is to make the world safer by reducing the likelihood of armed conflict and mitigating its consequences through limitations on specific categories of weapons deemed particularly dangerous or destabilizing.