What is the key difference between adaptation and mitigation strategies in addressing climate change?

The key difference between adaptation and mitigation strategies in addressing climate change lies in their respective goals. Mitigation strategies aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and limit the extent of future climate change, while adaptation strategies aim to reduce the negative impacts of climate change that are already happening or are expected to happen in the future. Mitigation focuses on addressing the *causeof climate change (greenhouse gas emissions), whereas adaptation focuses on addressing the *consequencesof climate change (e.g., sea-level rise, extreme weather events). For example, transitioning to renewable energy sources, improving energy efficiency, and promoting sustainable transportation are mitigation strategies that aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Building seawalls, developing drought-resistant crops, and implementing early warning systems for extreme weather events are adaptation strategies that aim to reduce the vulnerability of communities and ecosystems to climate change impacts. While mitigation and adaptation are distinct strategies, they are also complementary and often mutually reinforcing. Effective climate action requires both mitigation to limit future warming and adaptation to cope with the unavoidable impacts of climate change. Some actions, such as restoring coastal wetlands, can serve both mitigation and adaptation goals by sequestering carbon and providing coastal protection.