Which type of stakeholder, in a conflict mapping exercise, typically has high influence but low direct interest in the conflict's immediate outcome?

A secondary stakeholder typically has high influence but low direct interest in the conflict's immediate outcome during a conflict mapping exercise. Conflict mapping is a visual tool used to identify and analyze the actors, issues, and relationships within a conflict. Stakeholder analysis is an integral part of conflict mapping, categorizing individuals or groups based on their level of influence on the conflict and their level of interest in its outcome. Primary stakeholders are directly affected by the conflict and have a high interest in its resolution. Key stakeholders have both high influence and high interest, making them central to the conflict dynamics. Secondary stakeholders, in contrast, may not be directly impacted by the immediate results of the conflict, resulting in a lower level of direct interest; however, they possess significant influence due to their position, resources, or authority. For example, a government regulatory agency might have the power to influence a business dispute's outcome through its regulatory authority, even though it doesn't directly benefit or lose from either company winning. Their influence stems from their ability to enforce rules or make decisions that impact the conflicting parties, rather than a direct stake in the specific outcome.