What structured technique for identifying potential project risks involves anonymously collecting and synthesizing expert opinions to reach a consensus?

The structured technique described, involving anonymously collecting and synthesizing expert opinions to reach a consensus for identifying potential project risks, is known as the Delphi Technique. This method is a systematic forecasting and decision-making approach that relies on a panel of experts. The core principle of the Delphi Technique is anonymity, meaning the participating experts do not meet in person and their individual contributions are not revealed to each other. This ensures that responses are free from social pressure, dominant personalities, and groupthink biases. The process typically proceeds in several rounds. In the first round, a facilitator presents a questionnaire to the experts, asking them to independently identify potential project risks. After this initial collection, the facilitator gathers all responses, synthesizes them into an anonymous summary, and provides this consolidated feedback to the entire expert panel. In subsequent rounds, experts review the summarized feedback and are given the opportunity to revise their initial opinions or add new insights, often being asked to provide justifications for responses that deviate significantly from the group's trend. This iterative feedback loop continues until a consensus is reached among the experts regarding the identified risks, their characteristics, or until the opinions stabilize within a predefined range. The Delphi Technique thus leverages diverse expert knowledge to achieve a high-quality, objective identification of risks by systematically refining individual judgments into a collective, agreed-upon understanding.