What is the primary ethical consideration regarding competence in CISM practice?

The primary ethical consideration regarding competence in CISM practice is the obligation to provide services only within the boundaries of one's training, experience, and expertise. This means that a CISM provider must accurately assess their own skills and knowledge and avoid offering interventions or working with populations for which they are not adequately prepared. Practicing outside of one's competence can lead to ineffective or even harmful interventions, potentially exacerbating the distress of individuals who are already vulnerable. Competence involves not only possessing the necessary knowledge and skills but also recognizing one's limitations and seeking appropriate supervision, consultation, or referrals when necessary. It also entails engaging in ongoing professional development to maintain and enhance one's competence over time. For example, a CISM provider who is trained in working with adults but has limited experience with children should not attempt to provide crisis intervention services to children without proper supervision and training. Maintaining competence is an ethical imperative that protects the well-being of those seeking CISM services.