How does confirmation bias specifically impact the objective evaluation of risk?

Confirmation bias hinders the objective evaluation of risk by causing individuals to selectively seek out and interpret information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs about the level of risk involved, while simultaneously ignoring or downplaying information that contradicts those beliefs. This selective processing of information leads to a distorted perception of the actual risks. For example, if a manager believes that a particular investment is low-risk, they are more likely to focus on positive indicators and ignore warning signs, leading to an underestimation of the potential for loss. Conversely, if someone believes that a certain activity is highly risky, they will likely focus on negative information and disregard evidence suggesting that the risk is manageable, leading to an overestimation of the danger. This biased assessment can result in poor decision-making, such as taking on excessive risk or avoiding potentially beneficial opportunities due to an inaccurate perception of the threat. Because confirmation bias operates largely unconsciously, it makes it difficult for individuals to objectively weigh all available evidence and arrive at a balanced and accurate assessment of risk.