A fish is found floating belly-up in a large, moving body of water, but shows no visible signs of injury or decomposition. Under which specific condition, according to widely accepted juristic views, would its consumption be deemed permissible?

According to widely accepted juristic views, primarily within Islamic jurisprudence which governs dietary permissibility, the specific condition under which a fish found floating belly-up in a large, moving body of water would be deemed permissible for consumption is that the fish died naturally while still fully immersed in the water. This means its death occurred within its natural aquatic environment, and it was not taken out of the water alive and subsequently died on land, nor was its death caused by an external factor that would render it impermissible. For fish, unlike land animals, ritual slaughter is not required; their natural death within their water habitat is considered sufficient for permissibility. The description "large, moving body of water" signifies a pure, natural environment, consistent with the fish dying in its appropriate habitat, which contrasts with stagnant or polluted waters. The absence of "visible signs of injury or decomposition" further supports the conclusion that the fish died recently and naturally within the water, indicating it is not a diseased specimen, a spoiled carcass, or one killed by an impermissible method. Juristic views refer to the legal principles and rulings derived from religious law by scholars, determining what is permissible (halal) or forbidden (haram) for consumption.