In a remote, isolated coastal community where no other food source is available, what specific juristic condition must be met to permit the temporary consumption of a conventionally impermissible marine species for survival, based on the principle of 'necessity renders the forbidden permissible'?

The specific juristic condition that must be met to permit the temporary consumption of a conventionally impermissible marine species for survival, based on the principle of 'necessity renders the forbidden permissible' (*darurat tubih al-mahzurat*), is the clear and unequivocal establishment of *darurah(dire necessity). *Darurahis a state of extreme and unavoidable compulsion where an individual or a community faces an imminent and severe threat to life or a vital faculty, and there is absolutely no permissible alternative available to avert this harm. For this condition to be met in the described isolated coastal community, the following elements must be definitively present: First, there must be an immediate, certain, and severe threat to life due to starvation. This means that without consuming the otherwise forbidden marine species, the community members face certain death or grave, irreversible harm. Second, all conventionally permissible food sources, often referred to as *halal(lawful or permissible), must be genuinely and completely exhausted and unavailable, despite all reasonable efforts to find them. There can be no other edible, lawful substance that can sustain life. Third, the consumption of the conventionally impermissible marine species must be strictly limited to the bare minimum amount necessary to preserve life and alleviate the immediate danger of starvation. It is not a permission for unlimited consumption, indulgence, or to satisfy desire, but solely for sustenance. This permission is temporary and remains valid only as long as the dire necessity persists, ceasing immediately once the threat to life is removed or a permissible food source becomes accessible.