What is the predominant juristic ruling within the Maliki Madhhab concerning the consumption of all types of marine creatures, irrespective of their form?

Within the Maliki Madhhab, which is one of the four main Sunni schools of Islamic law, the predominant juristic ruling concerning the consumption of all types of marine creatures, irrespective of their form, is that they are permissible (halal) to eat. This broad permissibility stems from a wide interpretation of Quranic verses, such as "Lawful to you is game from the sea and its food as provision for you and the travelers." The Maliki school understands "game from the sea and its food" to encompass every creature that lives exclusively in water. This means that whether a creature is a fish, a crustacean like shrimp or crab, or a mollusk like squid or octopus, it is considered permissible for consumption. There is generally no requirement for ritual slaughter, known as dhabihah, for marine animals; they are considered permissible whether they are caught alive and then die, or found dead, such as washed ashore. However, this ruling applies specifically to creatures that live solely in water. Creatures that are amphibious, meaning they live both in water and on land, are generally not considered permissible without ritual slaughter, or are deemed impermissible altogether, such as frogs or crocodiles, as they do not exclusively inhabit the water. The fundamental principle for purely marine creatures is their inherent permissibility, provided they are not inherently harmful or poisonous.