What is the primary distinction between metacognitive knowledge and general cognitive knowledge?

The primary distinction between metacognitive knowledge and general cognitive knowledge lies in their focus: general cognitive knowledge concerns understanding *whatyou know, while metacognitive knowledge concerns understanding *howyou know and *how wellyou know it. General cognitive knowledge is the information and skills you possess in a particular domain, such as knowing historical facts or being able to perform arithmetic. Metacognitive knowledge, on the other hand, is your awareness and understanding of your own cognitive processes. This includes knowing your cognitive strengths and weaknesses (e.g., "I'm better at visual learning than auditory learning"), knowing which strategies are effective for you (e.g., "Summarizing helps me understand complex texts"), and knowing when and why to use these strategies. An example to further illustrate the difference: understanding the concept of gravity is general cognitive knowledge. Knowing that you struggle to remember physics formulas and that you need to use mnemonic devices to recall them is metacognitive knowledge. Essentially, general cognitive knowledge is *knowledge about the world*, while metacognitive knowledge is *knowledge about your own thinking processes*.