Why is understanding typical language development milestones important when implementing PECS?
Understanding typical language development milestones is crucial when implementing Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) because PECS is designed to build foundational communication skills that are often delayed in individuals who benefit from it. PECS is an evidence-based intervention primarily used with autistic individuals and those with other communication challenges, who may have difficulty with spoken language. These individuals frequently exhibit differences in how they acquire and use language, often showing delays or atypical patterns across various developmental areas.
Typical language development follows a predictable sequence. Initially, infants babble and coo (around 6-12 months). Then, they begin to understand simple words and gestures, often before they speak (receptive language develops before expressive language). Around 12-18 months, they start using single words to communicate needs and wants. Toddlers then combine words into two-word phrases (around 18-24 months), gradually increasing sentence complexity and grammatical accuracy. By age 3, children typically use longer sentences and engage in more complex conversations. This progression demonstrates a gradual shift from nonverbal communication to increasingly sophisticated verbal communication.
PECS aims to establish functional communication skills by teaching individuals to exchange pictures for desired items or activities. The system is structured to mirror and build upon the typical stages of language development, albeit in a modified and visually supported way. For example, the first phase of PECS focuses on teaching the individual to exchange a single picture for a tangible item, mirroring the single-word stage of typical language. Later phases introduce sentence structure, such as requesting “I want [item]”, which parallels the two-word phrase stage. A child who hasn't yet reached the single-word stage might struggle with the initial picture exchange, requiring more foundational support in understanding cause and effect and object representation. Conversely, a child who is already using multi-word phrases might progress through PECS more quickly.
Knowing these milestones allows PECS implementers to tailor the intervention to the individual’s current communication abilities. If a child demonstrates limited understanding of object representation (a key pre-language skill), PECS implementation might need to begin with activities that strengthen this understanding before introducing picture exchange. If a child is already using short phrases, the PECS program can be accelerated to focus on more complex sentence construction. Furthermore, understanding typical development helps identify areas where the individual is significantly deviating, allowing for targeted interventions to address those specific deficits. This individualized approach maximizes the effectiveness of PECS and promotes the development of more robust communication skills. Ignoring these milestones could lead to frustration for the individual and inefficient PECS implementation, potentially hindering progress.