What is a main thing that automatic code checker tools can't do well, even if they find problems in smart contracts?

The main thing that automatic code checker tools can't do well, even if they find problems in smart contracts, is accurately understand and verify the contract's *intended business logicor *semantic correctness*. These tools are highly effective at identifying common technical vulnerabilities and structural issues, such as *reentrancy*, where a malicious actor can repeatedly call a function to drain funds before the initial transaction completes, or *integer overflows/underflows*, whi....