How does the principle of 'plausible deniability' function within the context of strategic self-inflation?

The principle of 'plausible deniability' in strategic self-inflation functions as a safeguard against accusations of outright falsehood or deception. It involves crafting inflated claims in a way that, while potentially exaggerated, are not demonstrably false and can be plausibly defended or explained away if challenged. This means the claims exist in a gray area where direct proof of their falsity is difficult to obtain. For example, claiming to have 'played a key role' in a successful project is self-inflation if one's actual contribution was minor. However, it maintains plausible deniability because 'key role' is subjective and difficult to definitively disprove. The strategic self-inflator avoids making claims that can be easily verified and refuted, opting instead for statements that allow for ambiguity and interpretation. This approach minimizes the risk of being exposed as a liar, while still allowing for the enhancement of perceived competence.