Under what conditions would a stealth tower design be prioritized over a standard lattice tower, disregarding cost?

A stealth tower design would be prioritized over a standard lattice tower, disregarding cost, primarily when aesthetic considerations or zoning restrictions severely limit or prohibit the construction of traditional towers. Stealth towers are designed to blend into their surroundings, often mimicking trees, flagpoles, or even building features. This is crucial in areas with strict visual impact regulations, such as historic districts, residential neighborhoods, or scenic environments. For example, in a national park or near a protected landmark, a standard lattice tower might be deemed unacceptable due to its visual intrusion. Similarly, in densely populated urban areas with height restrictions or community opposition to traditional towers, a stealth design might be the only viable option to secure necessary permits and approvals. Another situation is near airports where a standard tower's height and appearance could pose a greater risk to aviation safety, making a lower-profile, less conspicuous stealth design preferable. In these cases, even if the cost is significantly higher, the ability to obtain approvals and integrate the infrastructure into the environment makes a stealth tower the prioritized choice.