How do subject-specific notability guidelines differ from the general notability guideline?

While the general notability guideline (GNG) provides a broad framework for determining whether a topic is worthy of a Wikipedia article, subject-specific notability guidelines offer more tailored criteria for evaluating notability within specific areas of knowledge. The GNG requires significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, but the definition of 'significant coverage' and 'reliable sources' can vary depending on the subject. Subject-specific guidelines provide more specific examples of what constitutes significant coverage and what types of sources are considered reliable within that particular field. For example, the notability guideline for academics may place greater emphasis on peer-reviewed publications and citations in scholarly works, while the notability guideline for musical artists may focus on record sales, charting positions, and critical acclaim. Subject-specific guidelines often provide alternative criteria for establishing notability that are not covered by the GNG. These criteria may be based on the unique characteristics and standards of the subject area. If a topic meets the criteria outlined in a subject-specific notability guideline, it is generally considered notable, even if it does not fully meet the requirements of the GNG. However, failure to meet a subject-specific guideline does not automatically disqualify a topic from being notable, as it may still meet the broader criteria of the GNG.