What makes a 'reputable news archive' acceptable as a reliable source?

A 'reputable news archive' is acceptable as a reliable source on Wikipedia primarily because it preserves the editorial integrity and fact-checking processes of the original news organization. Several factors contribute to this reputation. First, the archive should be maintained by a reputable news organization with a history of accurate reporting. This indicates that the original articles underwent a process of verification before publication. Second, the archive should have clear policies regarding corrections and retractions, ensuring that errors are addressed and acknowledged. Third, the archive should be comprehensive and well-organized, allowing users to easily access and verify the information it contains. Fourth, the archive should maintain the original formatting and content of the articles, avoiding any alterations or distortions that could compromise their accuracy. For example, the online archives of 'The New York Times' or 'The Wall Street Journal' are generally considered reliable because these organizations have a long-standing commitment to journalistic integrity and maintain rigorous standards for fact-checking and accuracy. Using a reputable news archive allows Wikipedia editors to cite historical events and information with confidence, knowing that the source has a strong track record of reliability.