What is the best practice for presenting arguments on Wikipedia talk pages?

The best practice for presenting arguments on Wikipedia talk pages involves clarity, civility, and a strong reliance on reliable sources. Start by clearly stating the issue you are addressing and the specific change you are proposing. Provide a concise and well-reasoned explanation for your position, avoiding vague or emotional arguments. Support your claims with citations to reliable sources, demonstrating that your position is grounded in verifiable information. Engage respectfully with other editors, addressing their concerns and responding to their arguments in a thoughtful and constructive manner. Avoid personal attacks or inflammatory language, and instead focus on the merits of the issue at hand. Use proper formatting to make your comments easy to read and understand, including indenting your replies to indicate the flow of the conversation. Be willing to compromise and to consider alternative solutions that address the concerns of other editors. Remember that the goal of a talk page discussion is to reach a consensus that improves the article, not to 'win' an argument. For example, when arguing for the inclusion of specific information in an article, clearly state the information you want to add, explain why it is relevant and important, provide citations to reliable sources that support the information, and respond respectfully to any questions or concerns raised by other editors.