What is the most effective way to build consensus on a controversial Wikipedia edit?

The most effective way to build consensus on a controversial Wikipedia edit involves several key steps: initiating a discussion on the article's talk page, presenting clear and concise arguments supported by reliable sources, actively listening to and addressing the concerns of other editors, maintaining a respectful and civil tone, and being willing to compromise. Start by explaining the rationale for the proposed edit on the talk page, providing specific reasons and citing relevant sources to support the changes. Engage with other editors who express concerns or disagree with the edit, addressing their points directly and offering counter-arguments based on evidence. Avoid personal attacks or inflammatory language, and instead focus on the merits of the proposed edit. Be open to considering alternative solutions or compromises that address the concerns of other editors while still improving the article. If a consensus cannot be reached through discussion, consider seeking outside opinions through methods such as a request for comment (RfC) or dispute resolution. The goal is to work collaboratively with other editors to find a solution that is acceptable to the majority and that improves the overall quality and neutrality of the article. For example, if an edit adding information about a historical event is challenged, provide reliable sources that verify the information, address any concerns about neutrality or bias, and be willing to adjust the wording or presentation to accommodate different perspectives.