What is the *mosteffective method for addressing inaccurate information on a Wikipedia article, assuming direct editing is not possible due to a conflict of interest?

The *mosteffective method for addressing inaccurate information on a Wikipedia article, when direct editing is not possible due to a conflict of interest (COI), is to *post a detailed explanation of the inaccuracies on the article's talk page, along with reliable sources that contradict the inaccurate information. The talk page is a discussion forum associated with each Wikipedia article, where editors can discuss improvements and resolve disputes. By posting on the talk page, an editor with a COI can bring the inaccuracies to the attention of other, independent editors who can then review the information and make the necessary corrections. The explanation should be clear, concise, and factual, and it should be supported by reliable sources that meet Wikipedia's standards for verifiability. Simply stating that the information is inaccurate is not sufficient; the editor must provide evidence to support their claim. The more compelling the evidence and the clearer the explanation, the more likely it is that other editors will take action to correct the inaccuracies. This approach respects Wikipedia's COI policy by avoiding direct editing while still contributing to the accuracy and reliability of the encyclopedia.