In a Wikipedia dispute resolution process, what is the most critical attribute of evidence presented to support a claim?

In a Wikipedia dispute resolution process, the most critical attribute of evidence presented to support a claim is its *directrelevanceand *explicit supportfor the specific point being argued, as demonstrated through clear citations to reliable sources. Evidence must directly address the issue at hand and provide unambiguous support for the claim being made. It is not enough to simply present sources that are generally related to the topic; the evidence must specifically address the contested point and provide clear, verifiable information that supports the editor's position. Furthermore, the evidence must be presented in a clear and organized manner, with precise citations to the relevant passages in the sources. This allows other editors and administrators to easily verify the evidence and assess its credibility. The strength of the evidence, as determined by its relevance and reliability, is the primary factor in resolving disputes on Wikipedia.