Question

Describe the operational differences between a conventional activated sludge system and a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR).

Accepted Answer

Conventional activated sludge (CAS) systems and moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs) are both biological wastewater treatment processes, but they differ significantly in their operation. In a CAS system, microorganisms are suspended in the wastewater as a floc (a cluster of microorganisms). The wastewater is mixed and aerated to promote microbial growth and pollutant removal. After treatment, the mixed liquor flows to a secondary clarifier, where the solids settle out, and a portion is returned to the aeration basin as return activated sludge (RAS). This RAS maintains a high concentration of microorganisms in the system. An MBBR, on the other hand, uses small plastic carriers with a large surface area for biofilm growth. The carriers are suspended in the wastewater and move freely throughout the reactor. The microorganisms attach to the carriers and form a biofilm, which removes pollutants from the wastewater. There is no need for sludge recycle in an MBBR. Operational differences arise in several aspects. Solids retention time (SRT) control differs in CAS and MBBR systems. In CAS, the SRT is controlled by wasting a portion of the activated sludge. In MBBR, the SRT is naturally high because the biofilm is attached to the carriers, and the biomass is not easily washed out of the system. Hydraulic retention time (HRT) also differs. MBBR systems typically operate at lower HRTs than CAS systems, meaning that the wastewater spends less time in the reactor. This is because the biofilm in MBBR systems is highly concentrated and efficient at removing pollutants. Sludge settling is another operational difference. CAS systems require a secondary clarifier to settle the activated sludge, which can be prone to settling problems such as bulking. MBBR systems do not require a secondary clarifier if the effluent suspended solids are low enough. The biofilm carriers remain in the reactor because screens retain them. Process stability is also a factor. MBBR systems are generally more stable and resistant to shock loads than CAS systems. The biofilm provides a buffer against fluctuations in influent wastewater quality. Biomass concentration is another difference. MBBR systems can maintain a higher biomass concentration than CAS systems because the biofilm is attached to the carriers. This allows for higher treatment capacity in a smaller footprint. For example, a wastewater treatment plant that needs to increase its treatment capacity but has limited space could convert its CAS system to an MBBR system. This would allow the plant to treat more wastewater in the same footprint. Therefore, CAS and MBBR systems have distinct operational differences, with MBBRs offering advantages in terms of process stability, biomass concentration, and footprint, while CAS systems may be more cost-effective for some applications.

Home → All Courses → Engineering and Technology Courses → Wastewater Treatment Plant Operations and Lifecycle Management → Flashcard

Describe the operational differences between a conventional activated sludge system and a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR).